Mets Series Wrap-Up

« Jocketty Traded For the Wrong Guy! | Main | In Every Game »

On Saturday when Brad Thompson got thrown into the fire, Al Hrabosky pointed out that this was Thompson's first road game in the majors. He added that it's particularly tough to have your first road game in New York, but I suspect Thompson looked around Shea Stadium and thought to himself "Gee, what a dump. This is New York? I pitched in a nicer park in Memphis. Heck, I pitched in a nicer park in Sevierville, Tennessee." And so Thompson overcame what should've been scored as two errors from Albert Pujols and a target-less throw from So Taguchi to keep the Cardinals close. That's my main impression from this series, that it's unbelievable the New York Mets play in a run-down park with all the charm, grace and PA music of a forty year-old sewage treatment facility.

Jason Marquis and Matt Morris pitched well for the Cardinals, but unfortunately for Marquis he was up against a future Hall of Famer who forgot that he's supposed to be washed-up. While Morris had a little stretch in the 6th where he forgot how to throw strikes, overall he had a solid, groundball-happy performance and, unless La Russa and Duncan were asleep Sunday, evidently Morris can go 100 pitches. In my misspent youth Tommy John was the gold standard for groundball pitchers, and his gold standard was 20 groundball outs. With such a groundball-heavy staff that might happen once or twice this season, although hitters aim for the fences and strikeout a lot more than they did thirty years ago.

Mark Mulder struggled on Saturday, and I have to wonder if one of the other things pitch counts hath wrought is managers leaving their starter in the game until he gets 100 or so pitches. When you're getting the Eckstein treatment from career .214 hitter Ramon Castro in the 6th, warning bells should be ringing. They didn't ring loud enough though, or maybe the Shea synthesizers drowned the alarms out, as Kaz Matsui chased Mulder with a bases-clearing triple. Mulder will rebound, Morris will regress, and hopefully we'll end up with a three-way competition among 1A starters for Game 1 honors.

John Mabry had a home run swing (and miss) on the pitch before the home run. Maybe La Russa has another chapter for the sequel to "August Nights", because Mabry isn't swinging the bat like a guy with a career .414 slugging percentage. Don't get me wrong, Mabry (and Abraham Nunez) will not end the season with a 1000 OPS, but I like the confidence. With their hot streaks, La Russa was liable to do weird stuff with Mabry and Nunez, so some of the impact of Scott Rolen's injury would've been felt anyway.

Mark Grudzielanek stole second today when the Mets pitched out on yet another Yadier attempt to bunt. Even if you didn't see it, your first thought is probably "Ugh, Piazza", and you'd be right, as Piazza threw a two-hopper to second on said pitchout. While the Cardinals aren't a base stealing team -- presently only the Brewers, Red Sox and A's have fewer stolen bases -- I think they made a tactical mistake by not stealing on Friday and Sunday. Piazza really is that bad, having thrown out only 4 of 32 this year. I don't know if the Mets can leave him back there if he's going to hover around the Mendoza line as a hitter, but if they do, he's too easy to exploit.

Last but not least, it pains me to look at the lineup and see Pujols and Rolen missing, even though Pujols looked like he could use a day off. To make matters worse, Edmonds left the game early with a foot problem that seemed to go back to his slide into third on Saturday. The Cardinals have their first off-day in three weeks, and it couldn't come sooner.

Posted by Rob at May 16, 2005 02:11 AM
TrackBacks (Trackback URL: http://www.thebirdwatch.com/mt/bw-tb.pl/849)

I'm just glad we took two out of three using lineups that lacked two of our big guns each day.

I guess every lineup for the next 6 weeks will be missing one of our big guns, but if Mabty and Nunez continue to hit as well as they have, it won't matter much.

This is a well-deserved day off for a crew that had played fantastic ball without a rest for 3 weeks.

Posted by: salvo at May 16, 2005 08:06 AM

As a Cards fan located in NY during the 80's, I saw tons of games at Shea growing up. And while I am loathe to defend anything Mets, I did think that there was a certain charm to their ballpark. Yes, it's kind of dumpy, poorly lit, sadly out of date, etc, but somehow a pristine showcase park in Queens would seem out of place... kind of like the disconnect you feel when you walk into Comiskey (or whatever it's called now). Yankee stadium may be the house that Ruth built, but Shea is a field by and for the people. Seeing a game there is like watching it in someone's living room... no china set, no sparkly crystal, no pretense, just a comfortable (and surprisingly friendly) place to watch a game. But don't worry, I'm sure that they'll knock it down soon. :-)

Posted by: Jh at May 16, 2005 09:52 AM

No way Pujols gets two errors on the play. He had to leap and lunge for the ball in the first place. That is never an error.

Posted by: adfad at May 16, 2005 12:32 PM

I attended a party Friday night in Brooklyn with a bunch of Mets fans who took great delight in teasing me about the score. But the funniest thing was how amazed they were that Glavine was able to shut our lineup down.

Considering the fuss over the proposed Jets stadium and the Nets potential Brooklyn arena, I don't think the Mets will be able to get a new stadium anytime soon. And why do all these team names rhyme, anyway?

Posted by: Whitney at May 16, 2005 03:29 PM

JH, you seem to be describing the grace of gracelessness, which is too Zen for me. I still don't understand the logic of building a ballpark (and tennis center) under the flight path at LaGuardia.

Posted by: Rob at May 16, 2005 07:29 PM

Well, I'll give you this much: Shea is about as far from Zen as is humanly possible. That's kind of the point that I was trying to make.

There is a certain artificiality to lots of these new parks. Take the new park in Philly. It's built as a beautiful "neighborhood" ballpark, classic, clean, interesting sight lines, brick facade etc etc. But it's located in a sea of parking lots, with the closest human contact on non-game days being the people driving on the interstate next to it. Is it an improvement over the old Vet which is now a next door parking lot? Yeah, I guess. But there's something very false about it. You don't get that feeling at Shea, which was my main point.

Posted by: Jh at May 16, 2005 08:02 PM

Ah, I think I see. I've visited a fair number of the new cookie cutter parks in the minors. The older minor league stadia in Richmond or Harrisburg aren't as nice in many ways, but they have some sense of identity to them as opposed to feeling like they were pre-fabricated at a Hong Kong assembly line and plopped into their place without regard to the local architecture or landscape.

Posted by: Rob at May 16, 2005 08:12 PM