Dirty Half Dozen
« Farm Reports | Main | New Ballpark »That was a Medusa-head series. You don't want to look directly at it for fear that it'll turn you into stone. A few thoughts on the edges though.
First, my gut says Jason Isringhausen shouldn't be asked to pitch more than an inning. Too many pitches for him to make it that long. So I went to ESPN.com, which takes a fair amount of intestinal fortitude these days, and looked at how his 2005 pitches per inning compare to some other closers:
Closer IP #P #P/IP Cordero 74.3 1209 16.3 Rivera 78.3 1186 15.1 Isringhausen 59.0 922 15.6 Lidge 71.7 1137 15.9 Turnbow 67.3 1049 15.6
Uh, never mind. That Rivera guy is pretty good, especially with the league adjustment.
Second, I really don't like Jim Edmonds being pulled as part of a double-switch. I'm going to assume that Edmonds will come around (and that LaRussa believes Edmonds will come around), because the alternative is also Medusa-head quality. Sitting Edmonds leaves the Cardinals' lineup looking like Pujols, Rolen and the Seven Dwarves in a one-run game. I understand that one of the Rules of Closer Usage is that the closer must be given a reasonably clear path to completing the game, but with one on, nobody out in the bottom of the 8th and one of the best hitters in baseball at the plate, there's a pretty good chance the Cubs will tie the game up. I don't have win expectancy tables, and I'm not sure they'd do much good since Derrek Lee and Aramis Ramirez are better than average hitters, so I'm left to guestimate there was something like a 40% chance for the Cubs scoring in either the 8th or 9th.
Finally, six games into the '06 season, it seems appropriate to me that the Cardinals' home opener takes place in an unfinished stadium, because the team that's playing in it is clearly a work in progress. I see a lot of misfits that will have to be shaped into Cardinal Baseball Players. It sounds like a recurring theme of American cinema, from The Dirty Dozen to other less memorable stuff. Among the newcomers, you've got the drunk guy, the fat guy, the guy who's too small, the guy who has some tools and no idea how to use them, the demoted guy, and the guy with bad facial hair. I think there's enough talent there to support the Big Three and the starting pitchers. I also keep thinking of how the Cardinals never could figure out what to do with the half-empty, half-full parts of the 2003 roster. Has LaRussa ever dealt well with this kind of motley crew?
Posted by Rob at April 10, 2006 11:37 AMi don't know, personally, i thought Down Periscope was an outside candidate for Oscar Gold
Posted by: ryan vb at April 11, 2006 08:03 AMSo who are the members of the dirty dozen? Would be great to give us who the "fat guy" is, or who the guy with the tools but doesn't know how to use em is.
-CJ
Josh Hancock was released by the Reds because he was overweight. The tools guy is Juan Encarnacion.
I will confess to liking Down Periscope, even though its plot was painfully by-the-numbers. Kelsey Grammer knows how to be a likeable fellow.
Posted by: Rob at April 11, 2006 11:37 AMDoes anyone out there get scared,like I do,when Isringhausen comes in?Joe Buck is correct;a bat and a closer or the Cardinals won't win the World Series. They can win the NLCS, but the AL is just too tough for the Cards as they are. What do you think?
Posted by: dave at April 13, 2006 12:36 PM